Political and Emotional Dictatorship within Junot Diazs Brief and Wond

Political and Emotional Dictatorship within Junot Diazs Brief and Wondrous Life of Oscar WaoWorks Cited MissingJunot Daz published his first tonic and second book The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao in 2006, forty-five years after the 1930-1961 rule of Trujillo over the Dominican Republic collapsed. Thats the central penning of the novel dictatorship. It concerns not only political, man-over-man, Trujillo-brutal dictatorship (though that is a haunting image throughout), but also psychological despots the dictatorship of fear, of orphanage, of blighted love, of displacement, of cancer, of nerdiness, of ostracization, of obesity, of unrequited love, of male internal hunger (both under- and over-supplemented), and, above all, of fuk?a general curse or doom, as Daz explains in his introduction, that they say ... came from Africa, carried in the screams of the enslaved, they say it was the death cuss of the Tainos, uttered just as one world perished and another began (1). But Daz is d isciplined in his craft he doesnt just fritter away despots higgledy-piggledy throughout the novel, no, Daz presents the theme following a definitive structure that resembles a V?starting at one doom (one despot) and expanding to encompass several. The main characters of the novel?those of and around the Cabral-Wao lineage?are subject (victim) to this pattern. Fuk, of course, is not simply and superstitiously a general curse, really it represents the ethnic upheaval (to say the least) of the Dominican Republic and the rest of the Latin American world that started when the Spaniards discovered the New World?or when the U.S. invaded Santo Domingo in 1916 (212). So fuk is imperialism. Daz couldnt possibly chronicle within a... ...car Wao is powerless against that. Junot Daz himself clearly sympathizes with the victims of oppression, is no totalitarian, hierarchic right-winger. This is evident simply in his narrative style a slang-wielding, street-friendly, straight-forward minimali st, unafraid to use what others would consider ?unworthy? of literature. His liberal approach, executed of course with an immense talent and discretion (just using the word ?Homedog? doesn?t make a literary genius), delivers a visceral intimacy of the environment and dispositions of his characters that require no decoding to enjoy, accomplishes what Wordsworth and Whitman intended free literature from its academic stronghold. Daz?s non-hierarchical stance is incandescent, but, as history has shown, the above goal likely won?t be achieved by a single hand. And that?s only fall in of the struggle for democracy.